Bidoun Review of Sons of Gebelawi

Abnaa al Gebelawi (Children of Gebelawi), By Ibrahim Farghali, Cairo: Al Ain, 2009

omahfou002p1.jpg

In Ibrahim Farghali’s Abnaa al Gebelawi, all of the texts of the great Egyptian novelist Naguib Mahfouz suddenly vanish from the face of the earth. This happens without explanation, reason, or ostensible cause: wherever they might be found – not only in libraries and bookshops but also on bookshelves and bedside bedside tables – novels by Mahfouz in their original Arabic are simply nowhere to be found. The authorities’ attempt to remedy the situation in the face of worldwide and (notably, if somewhat incredibly) popular uproar are juxtaposed with sightings of Mahfouz’s characters in a variety of locales, seldom having anything to do with the settings in which they actually appear in Mahfouz’s books.

With six – now seven – books to his name, Farghali (b. 1967) is among the most prolific novelists of his generation. In his devotion to the genre and his formal conservatism, he is perhaps the worthiest heir to Mahfouz (1911-2006), the Nobel prize winner most known for his mid-century tales of Cairo. Unlike Mahfouz, however, Farghali is firmly steeped in a magical realist tradition. Running through much of his prose are echoes of Jose Saramago’s nightmarish humour or shades of Italo Calvino’s fascination with the fantastical nature of fiction. He is taken by twins, telepathy and teleporting, and his firmly middle-class characters – otherwise utterly ordinary – have been known to reappear after they have died.

In Abnaa al Gebelawi – Farghali’s latest and greatest work – we face the prospect of a world without literature. The myriad voices in the book — for the young narrator cum author assumes many guises throughout these pages — express concern as to the fraught future of Arabic literature, about the erosion of the liberal and humane values that Mahfouz and his work represent, and (reflecting perhaps the essential fear of all true writers) about oblivion at large.

The events of the book are staged around a relatively uncomplex love affair involving the narrator and the eccentric daughter of a well-to-do family— occasion for Farghali to probe the psychology of class and sex in contemporary Egyptian society. Further in, however, the story breaks up and morphs into countless alternative and subordinate plot-lines, until it becomes clear (although it is never stated) that the whole of Abnaa al Gebelawi is but the barely coherent waste of a single pluralistic mind – the mind of a young writer concerned with the literary wasteland around him. The allegorical dimension remains predominant, and in this way recalls Awlad Haretnah (Children of Our Alley, 1959), the title of whose earlier English translation Farghali translates back verbatim for his own.

As it happens, Awlad Haretnah was the only book by Mahfouz to suffer censure from the religious establishment. In it the history of a popular residential quarter in Cairo stands in for the sum total of humanity’s spiritual experience. That quarter’s oldest, strongest and most benevolent resident – for many generations hidden away in his mansion – is called Gebelawi. Gebelawi has envoys or representatives, descendants or grandchildren, whose struggles to spread peace and justice make up episodes of the saga. Each is a retelling of the life of one of the prophets of Islam, starting with Adam and ending with the False Messiah. Moses, Jesus, and Mohammad all feature, but at the end a rumour spreads that Gebelawi himself has died. In Arab literary circles it is frequently claimed that if not for Awlad Haretnah, Mahfouz would not have received the Nobel Prize. But it proved too much for orthodox, let alone radical Muslims, for whom Mahfouz would become the enemy soon enough.

image2jpgtn3.jpg

a letter from Mahfouz to Mohammad al Badawi

Radical Islam had claimed many lives since the 1980s when in 1994 Mahfouz barely survived being knifed to death outside his house in Cairo. The irony was that, of all the helpless octogenarians his bearded young assailants could have targeted for apostasy, he was probably the least secular. A typical Cairene of the pre-bin ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Laden era, the man had led an all but exemplary (for which read profoundly unadventurous) life. He did not seek revolution, he did not take great risks. He had no utopian or transcendental illusions. And perhaps it was thanks to this and this alone that he was able to invent and reinvent the novel, the youngest genre in the language, defining it for generations of writers down to Farghali.

Applying every novelistic model at his disposal, Mahfouz produced a phenomenal number of readable books: social chronicles, political critiques, philosophical manuals. None was too difficult or experimental to render it inaccessible to even the most common reader. None sought to undermine whatever pillar of the status quo it came in contact with. Notwithstanding the elaborately veiled, painstakingly respectful Ages-of-Man narrative in Awlad Haretnah – a Muslim treatise on the meaning of life if ever there was one – in Mahfouz’s books, the family, the creed, the government are never attacked for what they are or what they stand for, but only for their most striking deviations, omissions or excesses.

For a magic realist like Farghali, Mahfouz may not be the most obvious point of departure; the Nobel laureate is, after all, best known for devotion to the real even in his least realistic works, and one would have trouble imagining him so much as hinting at the paranormal or the fantastical. Yet in Abnaa al Gebelawi, the grand opera to Farghali’s various arias, Mahfouz is an embodiment of something not so different from the sense of sight. His books stand in for almost everything Farghali values: Literature, Thought, Freedom, Knowledge, even Love. The premise could not have been more powerful.

bidoun_logo_revised_large.jpg

The Sands incarnate

arabian-desert1I am on the way to Al Ain to attend the opening of the newly restored Al Jahili Fort when it starts to rain. I know the event will take place in the open air and, thinking of its seemingly miraculous highlight – the presence among the audience of the late Wilfred Thesiger’s travelling companions Salim bin Ghabaisha and Salim bin Kabina, the two teenagers from the Rawashid tribe immortalised in his book Arabian Sands – I suddenly relish what cold and discomfort might come as a tiny taste of the unique spell “this cruel land can cast”.

While the microbus nears its destination, the window frames the crest of a sand dune, fleshing out the fantasy of being in the Sands. A pale yellow mound of immense proportions (though I know it is much smaller than its grand siblings to the south), the dune’s indistinct edge wavers across the gleaming orange disk of the slowly setting sun; and it is as if I am seeing animated colour versions of Thesiger’s striking black-and-white photographs of dune country. The sensation is both cheering and unsettling.

Bin Ghabaisha and bin Kabina arrived with Thesiger at Jahili, fresh from the wilderness, in 1949; exhausted by limited supplies and marauding tribesmen, they were graciously received by HH Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan, then the Ruler’s representative in Al Ain, whose hospitality they would never forget. Their admiration for Sheikh Zayed was such that, so many years later – neither bin Ghabaisha nor bin Kabina have birth dates but they must be in their eighties by now – they leapt at the chance to honour the memory and express their love, repeatedly stating that Sheikh Zayed’s virtues are incarnate in his progeny. 

When I arrive at the fort, four lush, cafe-au-lait, distinctive looking camels are standing sentinel at the entryway, two on either side of the red carpet; and by asking their minders what breed they are, I manage to confirm my proximity to the Sands: these are Banat Antar, or the Daughters of Antar (as Thesiger points out, only female camels are used for riding in these parts). “He lived 150 years ago,” the man speaks of the animals’ male ancestor, Antar, “and still people identify them by his name. They cost millions, especially those of them used in racing.” 

In the twilight, with spare, warm lights glittering at key spots, the space looks magical: dust ground, white crescent against cobalt blue sky, and off-white mud brick in rectangular formation; the circular towers are especially imposing in their sheer austerity of form. But it is bin Ghabaisha and bin Kabina who subtly upstage all else: the one squat and bare headed, with a grave expression on his face, his bow-shaped light beard deeply hennaed; the other taller and leaner, wholly affable, with a simple white head dress, a long white beard and a stick in his hand. 

Drawn in by bin Kabina’s smile, I join their gathering for as long as I can. “When I walked in Jahili today,” bin Kabina whispers at one point, “I remembered Zayed and the day we came. And I felt just as young as I was then.” But with officials and friends charging ahead in various directions and the two old Bedouin constantly changing position to keep up with them, before too long I have lost sight of the two people I came to see.

Night falls to the sound of drums as the incredibly poised ayala dance is performed outside the gate. Two lines of men face each other – barely moving as they sway in tempo in a manner that recalls the camel’s sedate gait, waving their sticks and chanting in hoarse unison – while the drummers flit in a single, integrated troop from one row to the other, exaggerating the movements of the dancers as they vigourously set the rhythm: a many-bodied, loudly provocative beast. 

For hours, while official functions render bin Ghabaisha and bin Kabina (in the company of HH Sheikh Sultan bin Tahnoon now) inaccessible, I dither between the exhibition and the stage, biding my time while I attempt to reconcile the two strong, rough-hewn teenagers in Thesiger’s photographs with these wise old men, as well heeled as they are frail. But as the evening comes to a close I see them leaning on their children’s arms on their way out. I attempt to catch up but I lose sight of them again.

Sighing, I waddle in the wake of the departing audience when suddenly I glimpse the yellow kandura of bin Ghabaisha and realise they have been ambushed near the parking lot. “Zayed is the best ruler,” I hear bin Ghabaisahas saying, “and his children by the will of God are also the way he is. I take pride in this state. The Christian,” he refers to Thesiger, “depended on Zayed. When he went to a place he did not know, he only had to mention Zayed’s name, because who has not heard of Zayed? His generosity, his courage, his knowledge, his horsemanship, his camel riding, his every quality – no one in the entire world,” he says again, “no one surpasses Zayed.”